Loading

Tradingview scores 82 out of 100 on the Agent Readiness Index

Tradingview reaches level 4, Trusted. Identity and delegation is the strongest area at 90 out of 100. Marketing readiness is the weakest at 63.

Tradingview was scanned on November 12, 2026. Its score is 82 out of 100, level 4, Trusted. A customer can authorize an agent with limited, revocable access. To reach level 5, Native: Support agents on every channel: passkeys, a high assurance profile and a voice line scoring 70 or more.

Website: tradingview.com

Score by area

AreaScoreWhat it asks
Discoverability78 out of 100, worth 22 pointsCan an agent find and read your pages?
Protocol access64 out of 100, worth 14 pointsCan an agent connect to you through MCP or an API?
Identity and delegation90 out of 100, worth 12 pointsCan a customer give an agent limited access without sharing a password?
Web experience70 out of 100, worth 20 pointsDoes your site work when an agent uses it?
Voice and IVRNot measured yetWhat happens when an agent calls your phone line?
Policy and governance84 out of 100, worth 6 pointsDo your terms allow agents that act for customers?
Marketing readiness63 out of 100, worth 18 pointsCan an agent see what you sell, and buy or book it?

What is holding Tradingview back

  1. Sign in page loads for a declared agent in a browser, 5.8 points lost. The sign in address that was tried returned status 404, so the sign in page itself could not be confirmed. Fix: Serve the sign in page to verified agent browsers, and use signed agent identity to separate them from attackers.
  2. Semantic page structure, 3.8 points lost. The page structure is only partly readable by agents. Fix: Use landmark elements, headings in order, accessible names on buttons and alt text on images.
  3. llms.txt guide for agents, 3.6 points lost. No llms.txt file was found at the site root. Fix: Publish /llms.txt with links to product, pricing, support and location pages.
  4. Product or service catalog with images, 3.5 points lost. No catalog of products or services with images was found: no feed, no catalog file and no structured data. Fix: Publish a product or service feed JSON or XML with an image and a price or plan for each item, and add structured data to the pages.

What already works

  • MCP server
  • OAuth and OpenID metadata
  • PKCE and client registration

How Tradingview compares

The average score for other is 42.6 out of 100 across 989 organizations. The average across all 2,353 scored organizations is 44.2 out of 100.

Similar organizations

More on this report